Does the Word “Settlement” Imply Legal Action to the “Least Sophisticated Consumer”?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law which protects consumers from unscrupulous collection agencies.  Collection Agencies are prohibited from using unfair, deceptive or misleading means to collect a consumer debt.   In crafting the FDCPA, Congress drafted the law using the “least sophisticated consumer”.  The “least sophisticated consumer” is designed to protect both the shrewd and the gullible.   In Tennessee, the time limit for suing someone on a debt is six years from the last voluntary payment; this is called the statute of limitations. In other words, if a creditor sued a consumer on a debt in which it had been more than six years since a voluntary payment was made by the consumer, the consumer would have an affirmative defense that the debt was time-barred and therefore the case against the consumer could be dismissed.

Collection Agencies Offering "Settlements"

Numerous collection agencies send collection letters to consumers offering “settlement” options in which they attempt to persuade the consumer to set up payments or pay less than what is owed. Often these collection letters are sent to consumers on debts that are time-barred.  If a consumer pays on the time-barred debt, the six-year statute of limitations starts over and the collection agency would have the right to sue the consumer. A recent case from the Sixth Circuit raises an interesting question: does sending a collection letter offering ‘settlement” options on a time-barred debt infer legal action, thus violating the FDCPA?

Does "Settlement" Imply Legal Action

In Buchanan v. Northland Group, Inc., the Plaintiff (Buchanan) argued that using the word settlement on a time-barred debt could lead the “least sophisticated” consumer into believing that legal action could be taken against them (the collection agency was about to sue them) if they did not pay this debt.  Northland Group, Inc. (the Defendant) filed a motion to have the case dismissed arguing that the word settlement would not lead a consumer to believe they would be sued if they did not pay the debt and thus was not a violation of the FDCPA. The District Court dismissed the complaint against Northland Group saying this was not a violation of FDCPA. Buchanan appealed the decision and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that it was plausible that a consumer could infer the word settlement to mean legal action, but only a jury was qualified to make that determination.  The case was remanded back to the District Court where Buchanan could proceed with a jury trial to determine the issue.  However, instead of going to trial, the case was settled without a final determination as to whether using “settlement” language to collect time-barred debts inferred legal action, thus creating a violation of the FDCPA.

The attorneys at Bond and Botes are very knowledgeable regarding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, as well as other defenses you may have against creditors and collection agencies.   The FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from engaging in unfair, false, deceptive or misleading means in their attempts to collect a debt.  A debt collector may be violating your Federal rights to fair debt collection. If you feel you are being treated unfairly by a debt collector, please call us and set a free, no-obligation consultation.

Share This Page

Bond & Botes Law Offices

At Bond & Botes, we now offer full service bankruptcy consultation and filing over the phone or by video from the comfort and safety of your home or office. Please call 1-877-581-3396 or click here to setup your free phone or video consultation.

The lawyers at the Bond & Botes affiliated offices serve clients at offices in Anniston, Birmingham, Mobile, Montgomery, Opelika, Decatur, Huntsville, Florence, Haleyville and Gadsden, Alabama; Vicksburg, Hattiesburg and Jackson, Mississippi. Read our disclaimer here. You can view our Privacy Policy here.

Alabama Offices

Birmingham

2107 5th Avenue North
Age-Herald Building
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Phone: (205) 802-2200


Shelby County Location
15 Southlake Lane, Ste 140
Birmingham, AL 35244
Phone: (205) 802-2200


Florence Location
121 S. Court Street
Florence, AL 35630
Phone: (256) 760-1010


Huntsville Location
225 Pratt Avenue NE
Huntsville, AL 35801
Phone: (256) 539-9899


Montgomery Location
311 Catoma Street
Montgomery, AL 36104
Phone: (334) 264-3363


Decatur Location
605 Bank Street
Decatur, AL 35601
Phone: (256) 355-2447


Haleyville Location
914 19th St.
Haleyville, AL 35565
Phone: (205) 486-3580


Gadsden Location
430-B Chestnut Street
Gadsden, AL 35901
Phone: (256) 485-0195


Opelika Location
216 South 8th Street
Opelika 36801
Phone: (334) 887-7666


Anniston Location
1302 Noble St #2C
Anniston, AL 36201
Phone: (256) 344-3559


Cullman Location
200 Second Avenue SW
Cullman, AL 35055
Phone: (256) 739-9866


Mississippi Offices

Jackson Location
5760 I-55 North, Ste 100
Jackson, MS 39211
Phone: (601) 353-5000


Hattiesburg Location
607 Corinne St, Ste B8
Hattiesburg, MS 39401
Phone: (601) 264-7200


Vicksburg Location
1212 Farmer Street
Vicksburg, MS 39180
Phone: (601) 353-5000

© 2024 by Bond & Botes Law Offices. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy